It seems like we're all geared to think bigger must be better. However, the trouble is, as businesses get bigger, there are fewer alternatives. For example, many communities only have one choice when it comes to internet and cable services and, quite often, (as many of us can relate) when there's no choice, the price increases and customer service deteriorates.
Scale can bring short-term benefits but, frequently, many of these benefits disappear as larger enterprises gain more control over their markets. Unfortunately, the competitive pressure from giant corporations can have a profound impact on the economic well-being of smaller businesses in a local market.
Back in the 1980's, when Walmart started arriving in smaller local communities, many were excited to have convenient access to a larger range of products at lower prices. That is, until local businesses, many of which had been around for decades, started going out of business. This, in turn, led to less money being spent at Walmart (or anywhere else for that matter), and it wasn't long before a downward spiral was set in motion. It turned out, Walmart wasn't quite so positive for the local economy as most had initially thought it would be.
Many in smaller communities have banked with local community banks for years but, unfortunately, many get purchased by bigger banks. Then, the new owner often sets in motion a program of increased fees and hounding its new customer base with offers for financial services they're not interested in. Adding insult to injury, it becomes common to encounter a "greeter" who challenges customers for wanting to complete any transactions inside the bank when there's a perfectly good ATM outside! Seemingly oblivious to the fact that some customers prefer face-to-face contact, the larger banks blindly continue with their insensitive automation strategies, even as customers make it clear that's not what they want.
It's actions and behavior like this that local businesses must take advantage of to help reach the tipping point where a "local buy" decision is more likely to be made.
Buying local has a "multiplier" effect. This results from independent, locally owned businesses recirculating a far greater percentage of their profits locally than "absentee" owners of larger businesses headquartered elsewhere.
Spending money with locally owned businesses creates more local wealth and jobs in that community.
The argument for enterprises like Walmart improving spending power and increasing the range of consumer choice was more compelling 30 years ago than it is today. At that time, smaller local merchants simply didn't have the means, the access, or the expertise to source and provide the type of products Walmart was able to stock its shelves with.
However, during the last 20 years, wide-scale access to the internet has changed everything and, for those smaller businesses that have taken advantage of the changes, it has become possible to level the playing field and establish comparable value propositions to those of their much larger competitors.
This is very important because, unfortunately, businesses will not do business with smaller, local businesses just because they're local. Helping keep dollars in a local community, thereby increasing the spending power of the community members, is all very well but, very few businesses (certainly not enough to make a difference) will behave this way as an act of charity.
At a minimum, comparable performance on quality, availability, and price must be delivered before "local-buy" decisions become more likely and other incremental benefits can start to be anticipated. Benefits that include;
In these circumstances, the "local-buy" decision has a multiplier effect and serves to become a virtuous cycle.
Unfortunately, in the absence of a comparable value proposition, and because businesses almost always act in their own best interests it means, when there's a lower price with the same quality and service available from an anonymous, global enterprise, then that's invariably the winner.
The tipping point toward a "local-buy" decision only occurs after all other factors, such as availability, quality, service, and price is deemed more or less equal.
The challenge is for local businesses to develop a value proposition that equals or exceeds that of its larger competitors. A large business usually has a strong brand presence, is able to leverage its scale to negotiate the lowest costs and, quite often, has multiple, strategically located distribution centers where it stores its inventory ready for quick deliveries to any part of the nation.
On the face of it, these capabilities seem to form an insurmountable barrier for a small business to match. However, on closer examination, this is not necessarily the case.
However, in order to fully benefit from these advantages, smaller, local businesses must focus on implementing and leveraging technology to improve customer service, brand development, and to raise awareness.
In implementing information technology systems, smaller local businesses become empowered to match the technological performance of much larger competitors. As they also tap into the logistics of a "virtual" inventory to broaden their offering and improve their service, they cross the the tipping point necessary to eliminate major objections typically encountered for "local buy" decisions.